I have a question about the mortality rate of the virus. If there are as many people infected as some studies have lead us to believe, then is it possible that the virus is actually less deadly than the common flu? Also, I read AJ's question, and if we are attributing deaths to the virus, that are not actually caused by the virus itself, does this have a major impact on the way we perceive the data received from the virus? Will people, such as Gregg, be more skeptical of science after all is said and done?
good points. data is only as good as how it is being collected.